The use of security labels within XMPP is currently defined in Security Labels in XMPP (XEP-0258) [1]. This, however, does not cover the use of security labels within Publish-Subscribe (XEP-0060) [2]. This XEP defines a method to include security labels into publish-subscribe.
This allows content publishers to limit visibility of any sensitive published items to only those users with appropriate clearance to view them.
This document does not deal with the semantics of a Security Label or how the security policy is applied to decisions regarding Security Labels and Clearances.
This document should be read in conjunction with Publish-Subscribe (XEP-0060) [2] and Security Labels in XMPP (XEP-0258) [1].
In addition to the Glossary defined for Publish-Subscribe (XEP-0060) [2] the following terms are used:
A label that can be applied to content to restrict the visibility of the content to entities with appropriate Clearance.
The schema is defined in Security Labels in XMPP (XEP-0258) [1] with the XML namespace "urn:xmpp:sec-label:0".
This section defines the additions and caveats for the use cases and protocols defined in Publish-Subscribe (XEP-0060) [2].
A Security Label aware client SHOULD discover support for Security Labels within the Publish-Subscribe (XEP-0060) [2] service domain. If the service domain does not report support for Security Labels then the client SHOULD NOT publish with Security Labels.
<iq from='francisco@denmark.lit/barracks' id='disco1' to='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' type='get'> <query xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/disco#info'/> </iq>
<iq from='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' id='disco1' to='francisco@denmark.lit/barracks' type='result'> <query xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/disco#info'> ... <feature var='urn:xmpp:sec-label:0'/> ... </query> </iq>
A server SHOULD provide label feature and information discovery for each node.
Clients SHOULD discover label feature and information on a per-node basis.
<iq from='francisco@denmark.lit/barracks' id='disco2' to='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' type='get'> <query node='princely_musings' xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/disco#info'/> </iq>
<iq from='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' id='disco2' to='francisco@denmark.lit/barracks' type='result'> <query node='princely_musings' xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/disco#info'> ... <feature var='urn:xmpp:sec-label:catalog:2'/> ... </query> </iq>
A server SHOULD provide Security Label catalog discovery for each node.
Clients SHOULD discover the Security Label catalog on a per-node basis.
The server SHOULD limit the catalog for a node to those labels that are compatible with any Clearance associated with the node.
<iq id='cat1' to='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' type='get'> <catalog xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:catalog:2' to='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' node='princely_musings'/> </iq>
<iq from='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' id='cat1' to='francisco@denmark.lit/barracks' type='result'> <catalog xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:catalog:2' to='example.com' name='Default' desc='The set of labels applicable to the "princely_musings" node' restrict='false' node='princely_musings'> <item selector="Classified|SECRET"> <securitylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:0'> <displaymarking fgcolor='black' bgcolor='red'>SECRET</displaymarking> <label> <esssecuritylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:ess:0' >MQYCAQQGASk=</esssecuritylabel> </label> </securitylabel> </item> <item selector="Classified|CONFIDENTIAL"> <securitylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:0'> <displaymarking fgcolor='black' bgcolor='navy'>CONFIDENTIAL</displaymarking> <label> <esssecuritylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:ess:0' >MQYCAQMGASk</esssecuritylabel> </label> </securitylabel> </item> <item selector="Classified|RESTRICTED"> <securitylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:0'> <displaymarking fgcolor='black' bgcolor='aqua'>RESTRICTED</displaymarking> <label> <esssecuritylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:ess:0' >MQYCAQIGASk=</esssecuritylabel> </label> </securitylabel> </item> <item selector="UNCLASSIFIED" default="true"/> </catalog> </iq>
The server SHOULD NOT return any nodes that have a Security Label that the entity is not Cleared to view.
<iq from='francisco@denmark.lit/barracks' id='nodes1' to='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' type='get'> <query xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/disco#items'/> </iq>
<iq type='result' from='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' to='francisco@denmark.lit/barracks' id='nodes1' xmlns:slps='urn:xmpp:sec-label:pubsub:0'> <query xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/disco#items'> <item jid='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' node='blogs' name='Weblog updates' slps:label='seclabel-1'/> <item jid='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' node='news' name='News and announcements' slps:label='seclabel-2'/> <securitylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:0' slps:id='seclabel-1'> <displaymarking fgcolor='black' bgcolor='green'>UNCLASSIFIED</displaymarking> <label> <esssecuritylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:ess:0'>MQMGASk=</esssecuritylabel> </label> </securitylabel> <securitylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:0' slps:id='seclabel-2'> <displaymarking fgcolor='black' bgcolor='red'>SECRET</displaymarking> <label> <esssecuritylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:ess:0'>MQYCAQIGASk=</esssecuritylabel> </label> </securitylabel> </query> </iq>
The item list MUST NOT contain items that the entity is not Cleared to view.
The server SHOULD return an <item-not-found/>
error if the entity is not Cleared to view
the node.
See Subscriber Use Cases: Retrieve Items from a Node for more details of how Security Labels are respresented in the server response.
<iq from='francisco@denmark.lit/barracks' id='items1' to='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' type='get'> <query xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/disco#items' node='princely_musings'/> </iq>
<iq from='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' id='items1' to='francisco@denmark.lit/barracks' type='result' xmlns:slps='urn:xmpp:sec-label:pubsub:0'> <query xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/disco#items' node='princely_musings'> <item jid='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' name='368866411b877c30064a5f62b917cffe' slps:label='seclabel-1'/> <item jid='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' name='3300659945416e274474e469a1f0154c' slps:label='seclabel-1'/> <item jid='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' name='4e30f35051b7b8b42abe083742187228' slps:label='seclabel-2'/> <item jid='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' name='ae890ac52d0df67ed7cfdf51b644e901' slps:label='seclabel-1'/> <securitylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:0' slps:id='seclabel-1'> <displaymarking fgcolor='black' bgcolor='green'>UNCLASSIFIED</displaymarking> <label> <esssecuritylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:ess:0'>MQMGASk=</esssecuritylabel> </label> </securitylabel> <securitylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:0' slps:id='seclabel-2'> <displaymarking fgcolor='black' bgcolor='red'>SECRET</displaymarking> <label> <esssecuritylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:ess:0'>MQYCAQIGASk=</esssecuritylabel> </label> </securitylabel> </query> </iq>
The server SHOULD return an <item-not-found/>
error if the subscriber is not Cleared to view
the node.
The server SHOULD return an <item-not-found/>
error if the subscriber is not Cleared to view the
node.
The item list MUST NOT contain items that the subscriber is not Cleared to view.
The server MUST attach relevant <securitylabel/>
child elements to the <items/>
element.
Each of these <securitylabel/>
elements MUST posess an 'id' attribute (from the urn:xmpp:sec-label:pubsub:0
namespace) which is unique within the stanza.
The server SHOULD normalise the elements so that multiple <item/>
elements with the same
Security Label reference the same <securitylabel/>
element; However, the server might
instead include a <securitylabel/>
element for each <item/>
element regardless of whether there
are duplicates.
Each <item/>
that has a Security Label MUST posess a 'label' attribute (from the urn:xmpp:sec-label:pubsub:0
namespace) that references the id of the relevant <securitylabel/>
.
The server SHOULD NOT include <securitylabel/>
elements which are not referenced within the
stanza.
<iq from='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' id='items1' to='francisco@denmark.lit/barracks' type='result' xmlns:slps='urn:xmpp:sec-label:pubsub:0'> <pubsub xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub'> <items node='princely_musings'> <item id='368866411b877c30064a5f62b917cffe' slps:label='seclabel-1'> <entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'> <title>The Uses of This World</title> <summary> O, that this too too solid flesh would melt Thaw and resolve itself into a dew! </summary> <link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://denmark.lit/2003/12/13/atom03'/> <id>tag:denmark.lit,2003:entry-32396</id> <published>2003-12-12T17:47:23Z</published> <updated>2003-12-12T17:47:23Z</updated> </entry> </item> <item id='3300659945416e274474e469a1f0154c' slps:label='seclabel-1'> <entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'> <title>Ghostly Encounters</title> <summary> O all you host of heaven! O earth! what else? And shall I couple hell? O, fie! Hold, hold, my heart; And you, my sinews, grow not instant old, But bear me stiffly up. Remember thee! </summary> <link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://denmark.lit/2003/12/13/atom03'/> <id>tag:denmark.lit,2003:entry-32396</id> <published>2003-12-12T23:21:34Z</published> <updated>2003-12-12T23:21:34Z</updated> </entry> </item> <item id='4e30f35051b7b8b42abe083742187228' slps:label='seclabel-2'> <entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'> <title>Alone</title> <summary> Now I am alone. O, what a rogue and peasant slave am I! </summary> <link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://denmark.lit/2003/12/13/atom03'/> <id>tag:denmark.lit,2003:entry-32396</id> <published>2003-12-13T11:09:53Z</published> <updated>2003-12-13T11:09:53Z</updated> </entry> </item> <item id='ae890ac52d0df67ed7cfdf51b644e901' slps:label='seclabel-1'> <entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'> <title>Soliloquy</title> <summary> To be, or not to be: that is the question: Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And by opposing end them? </summary> <link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://denmark.lit/2003/12/13/atom03'/> <id>tag:denmark.lit,2003:entry-32397</id> <published>2003-12-13T18:30:02Z</published> <updated>2003-12-13T18:30:02Z</updated> </entry> </item> <securitylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:0' slps:id='seclabel-1'> <displaymarking fgcolor='black' bgcolor='green'>UNCLASSIFIED</displaymarking> <label> <esssecuritylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:ess:0'>MQMGASk=</esssecuritylabel> </label> </securitylabel> <securitylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:0' slps:id='seclabel-2'> <displaymarking fgcolor='black' bgcolor='red'>SECRET</displaymarking> <label> <esssecuritylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:ess:0'>MQYCAQIGASk=</esssecuritylabel> </label> </securitylabel> </items> </pubsub> </iq>
A <publish/>
element MAY contain a <securitylabel/>
which the service must apply to all the
items within the <publish/>
.
If a publisher wishes to publish multiple items with different Security Labels, they MUST send multiple <iq/> stanzas - one for each Security Label.
The server SHOULD apply the default label for the node to any items within a <publish/>
which
does not contain a <securitylabel/>
.
Any <securitylabel/>
within a <publish/>
should be compatible with any Clearance associated
with the node, else the service MUST return an <insufficient-clearance/>
error.
If a publisher attempts to publish to a node which the publisher is not Cleared to view, the
service SHOULD return an <item-not-found/>
error.
A publisher SHOULD not attempt to publish an item with a Security Label which is not suitable to the Clearance of the node.
Any <publish/>
with a <securitylabel/>
should be compatible with the Clearance of the
publishing entity, else the server MUST return an <insufficient-clearance/>
error.
<iq from='hamlet@denmark.lit/blogbot' id='pub1' to='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' type='set'> <pubsub xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub'> <publish node='princely_musings'> <item> <entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'> <title>Soliloquy</title> <summary> To be, or not to be: that is the question: Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And by opposing end them? </summary> <link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://denmark.lit/2003/12/13/atom03'/> <id>tag:denmark.lit,2003:entry-32397</id> <published>2003-12-13T18:30:02Z</published> <updated>2003-12-13T18:30:02Z</updated> </entry> </item> <securitylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:0'> <displaymarking fgcolor='black' bgcolor='green'>UNCLASSIFIED</displaymarking> <label> <esssecuritylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:ess:0'>MQMGASk=</esssecuritylabel> </label> </securitylabel> </publish> </pubsub> </iq>
The service then notifies appropriately Cleared subscribers. The server MUST NOT notify subscribers that do not have appropriate Clearance to view the item.
The server MUST include the <securitylabel/>
element as a child of the <message/> stanza. The
server MUST NOT include the <securitylabel/>
element within the <items/>
element.
The Security Label applies to the entire message (including all the items within the <items/>
element and any <body/> if the entity's subscription is so configured).
<message from='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' id='foo' to='francisco@denmark.lit'> <event xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub#event'> <items node=princely_musings'> <item id='ae890ac52d0df67ed7cfdf51b644e901'> <entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'> <title>Soliloquy</title> <summary> To be, or not to be: that is the question: Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And by opposing end them? </summary> <link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://denmark.lit/2003/12/13/atom03'/> <id>tag:denmark.lit,2003:entry-32397</id> <published>2003-12-13T18:30:02Z</published> <updated>2003-12-13T18:30:02Z</updated> </entry> </item> </items> </event> <securitylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:0'> <displaymarking fgcolor='black' bgcolor='green'>UNCLASSIFIED</displaymarking> <label> <esssecuritylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:ess:0'>MQMGASk=</esssecuritylabel> </label> </securitylabel> </message>
<message from='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' id='foo' to='francisco@denmark.lit'> <event xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub#event'> <items node=princely_musings'> <item id='ae890ac52d0df67ed7cfdf51b644e901' /> </items> </event> <securitylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:0'> <displaymarking fgcolor='black' bgcolor='green'>UNCLASSIFIED</displaymarking> <label> <esssecuritylabel xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:ess:0'>MQMGASk=</esssecuritylabel> </label> </securitylabel> </message>
If a publisher attempts to publish to a node with a Security Label that is incompatible
with the Clearance of the node then the server MUST return an <insufficient-clearance/>
error.
<iq from='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' id='sub1' to='francisco@denmark.lit/barracks' type='error'> <error type='modify'> <bad-request xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas'/> <insufficient-clearance xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:pubsub:errors:0'/> </error> </iq>
If a publisher attempts to publish to a node with a Security Label that is incompatible
with the Clearance of the publisher then the server MUST return an <insufficient-clearance/>
error.
<iq from='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' id='sub1' to='francisco@denmark.lit/barracks' type='error'> <error type='auth'> <insufficient-clearance xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:pubsub:errors:0'/> </error> </iq>
The server SHOULD return an <item-not-found/>
error if the subscriber is not Cleared to view
the node or item.
The server MUST NOT send retract requests to subscribers who are not Cleared to view the item.
The server SHOULD allow for configuration of Security Label parameters for a node via node configuration mechanisms. This approach is intended to be ad-hoc and so this section is intended to be illustrative of one possible approach. Implementations are free to utilize other approaches.
The server MUST disallow a node being created that has a default Security Label that is not within the clearance of the node.
<iq from='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' id='config1' to='hamlet@denmark.lit/elsinore' type='result'> <pubsub xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub#owner'> <configure node='princely_musings'> <x xmlns='jabber:x:data' type='form'> ... <field label='Node Label' type='list-single' var='sec-label#label'> <value>Catalog:UNCLASSIFIED</value> <option label='SECRET'><value>Catalog:SECRET</value></option> <option label='CONFIDENTIAL'><value>Catalog:CONFIDENTIAL</value></option> <option label='UNCLASSIFIED'><value>Catalog:UNCLASSIFIED</value></option> <option label='Custom'><value>Custom</value></option> </field> <field label='Custom Node Label' type='text-single' var='sec-label#custom-label'/> <field label='Node Clearance' type='list-multi' var='sec-label#clearance'> <value>Catalog:UNCLASSIFIED</value> <option label='SECRET'><value>Catalog:SECRET</value></option> <option label='CONFIDENTIAL'><value>Catalog:CONFIDENTIAL</value></option> <option label='UNCLASSIFIED'><value>Catalog:UNCLASSIFIED</value></option> <option label='Custom'><value>Custom</value></option> </field> <field label='Custom Node Clearance' type='text-single' var='sec-label#custom-clearance'/> </x> </configure> </pubsub> </iq>
Changing the Security Label or Clearance of an existing node is problematic for a number of reasons:
For these reasons an implementation MAY wish to disallow changes to the Security Label of an existing node with subscribers, disallow changes to the Clearance of a node with items, or limit the options within the node configuration to those which do not cause a conflict.
If an implementation chooses to allow a change to the clearance of a node that conflicts with the Security Label of existing items within the node then the server MUST purge the node of all items which are no longer within the updated clearance of the node, with or without notifying subscribers.
If an implementation chooses to allow a change to the Security Label of the node that causes conflicts with existing subscribers to the node then the server MUST remove all subscriptions from subscribers that are no longer Cleared to view the node. The server MUST notify these subscribers. The server SHOULD send a Node Deletion notification, but might instead send a Subscription Cancellation notification if entities are to be aware of the existence of nodes they do not have Clearance to view.
The server MUST prevent a change to the Security Label of the node which would prevent a node owner from accessing the node.
<message from='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' id='deletenotify1' to='francisco@denmark.lit'> <event xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub#event'> <delete node='princely_musings' /> </event> </message>
<message from='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' id='unsubnotify1' to='horatio@denmark.lit'> <event xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub#event'> <subscription jid='horatio@denmark.lit' node='princely_musings' subscription='none'/> </event> </message>
The protocol defined has the intention that, as far as possible, an entity should be unaware of
the existence of any nodes or items which they are not Cleared to view. Therefore server
responses to a request for a node which the entity is not Cleared to view SHOULD be identical to
a response as if that node did not exist (See BR1), i.e. an
<item-not-found/>
error is returned
<iq from='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' id='sub1' to='francisco@denmark.lit/barracks' type='error'> <error type='cancel'> <item-not-found xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-stanzas'/> </error> </iq>
It is worth noting that there are certain situations where this is impossible, for example if an entity wishes to create a node with the same NodeID as an existing node that they are not Cleared to view.
Alternatively, an implementation might wish to relax this rule and allow entities to become
aware of nodes they do not have Clearance to view. In this case an <insufficient-clearance/>
error MAY be returned instead.
If a service implements PubSub Collection Nodes (XEP-0248) [3] then there will need to be some consideration of node and item visibility within the node hierarchy.
Due to the complexity of the access control policies involved, an implementation MAY choose to do one or more of the following to simplify the implementation:
The rules and protocols defined elsewhere in this document are generally applicable to collection nodes with the following additions:
A collection node MUST NOT forward a publish notification with a Security Label that is incompatible with the Clearance of the collection node.
A collection node SHOULD NOT forward a node change notification (create/update/delete/associate) where the Security Label of the affected node is incompatible with the Clearance of the collection node.
The server SHOULD NOT send node change notifications to any entity where the Security Label of the affected node is incompatible with the Clearance of the entity.
The server MUST NOT return any items from leaf nodes where the individual Security Label of the item is incompatible with the Clearance of the requesting entity.
The server SHOULD NOT return any items from any associated nodes where the Security Label of the leaf node, or any intermediate collection node on the node graph, is incompatible with the Clearance of the requesting entity.
A server SHOULD NOT allow an entity to associate, either through configuration or through
an <associate/>
statement, a child node to a collection node if the Security Label of the
child node is incompatible with the Clearance of the collection node.
An implementation might choose to impose some kind of structure on items within a node. For example: items may include a list of blog posts, but may also include comments relating to specific blog posts from other users.
An implementation MAY apply different logic to the visibility of items in this case, perhaps by disallowing access to comment items if the requester is not Cleared to view the associated blog post item, even if the individual Security Label on the comment item would not normally prevent access.
However, the server MUST NOT allow access to an item if the requester is not Cleared to view the Security Label for the item (i.e. this mechanism must only be used to further restrict access to items and must not be used to widen access).
An implementation may wish to allow a subscriber to limit the sensitivity of items which are delivered for a certain subscription. For example: a subscriber may wish to only receive notifications of items which are unclassified, even if the node has a higher clearance.
One way this could be implemented is by expanding the Data Form for the subscription options.
<iq from='pubsub.shakespeare.lit' id='options1' to='francisco@denmark.lit/barracks' type='result'> <pubsub xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub'> <options node='princely_musings' jid='francisco@denmark.lit'> <x xmlns='jabber:x:data' type='form'> ... <field label='Limit Clearance' type='list-multi' var='sec-label#clearance'> <value>Catalog:UNCLASSIFIED</value> <option label='SECRET'><value>Catalog:SECRET</value></option> <option label='CONFIDENTIAL'><value>Catalog:CONFIDENTIAL</value></option> <option label='UNCLASSIFIED'><value>Catalog:UNCLASSIFIED</value></option> <option label='Custom'><value>Custom</value></option> </field> ... </x> </options> </pubsub> </iq>
This document is an extension to Security Labels in XMPP (XEP-0258) [1] and therefore any security considerations noted in that document will also apply to this document.
This document requires no interaction with the the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) [4]
This specification defines the following XML namespaces:
If the protocol defined in this specification undergoes a revision that is not fully backwards-compatible with an older version, the XMPP Registrar shall increment the protocol version number found at the end of the XML namespaces defined herein, as described in Section 4 of XEP-0053.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <xs:schema elementFormDefault='qualified' targetNamespace='urn:xmpp:sec-label:pubsub:0' xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:pubsub:0' xmlns:xs='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema'> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> The protocol documented by this schema is defined in XEP-xxxx: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-xxxx.html </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:attribute name='label' type='xs:IDREF'> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> References an "id" value in a <securitylabel> element. The referenced Security Label MUST then be applied to the element content. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> </xs:attribute> <xs:attribute name='id' type='xs:ID'> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> Defines a unique (across the document) id for a <securitylabel> element that can be referenced from a "label" attribute. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> </xs:attribute> </xs:schema>
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <xs:schema elementFormDefault='qualified' targetNamespace='urn:xmpp:sec-label:pubsub:errors:0' xmlns='urn:xmpp:sec-label:pubsub:errors:0' xmlns:xs='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema'> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> This namespace is used for error reporting only, as defined in XEP-xxxx: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-xxxx.html </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:element name='insufficient-clearance' type='empty'/> </xs:schema>
Thanks to Dave Cridland, John Atherton, Kurt Zeilenga, Lloyd Watkin, Ralph Meijer and Stephen Welch for their contributions.
This document in other formats: XML PDF
This XMPP Extension Protocol is copyright © 1999 – 2020 by the XMPP Standards Foundation (XSF).
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this specification (the "Specification"), to make use of the Specification without restriction, including without limitation the rights to implement the Specification in a software program, deploy the Specification in a network service, and copy, modify, merge, publish, translate, distribute, sublicense, or sell copies of the Specification, and to permit persons to whom the Specification is furnished to do so, subject to the condition that the foregoing copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Specification. Unless separate permission is granted, modified works that are redistributed shall not contain misleading information regarding the authors, title, number, or publisher of the Specification, and shall not claim endorsement of the modified works by the authors, any organization or project to which the authors belong, or the XMPP Standards Foundation.
## NOTE WELL: This Specification is provided on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, express or implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. ##
In no event and under no legal theory, whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise, unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall the XMPP Standards Foundation or any author of this Specification be liable for damages, including any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising from, out of, or in connection with the Specification or the implementation, deployment, or other use of the Specification (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill, work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all other commercial damages or losses), even if the XMPP Standards Foundation or such author has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
This XMPP Extension Protocol has been contributed in full conformance with the XSF's Intellectual Property Rights Policy (a copy of which can be found at <https://xmpp.org/about/xsf/ipr-policy> or obtained by writing to XMPP Standards Foundation, P.O. Box 787, Parker, CO 80134 USA).
The HTML representation (you are looking at) is maintained by the XSF. It is based on the YAML CSS Framework, which is licensed under the terms of the CC-BY-SA 2.0 license.
The Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) is defined in the XMPP Core (RFC 6120) and XMPP IM (RFC 6121) specifications contributed by the XMPP Standards Foundation to the Internet Standards Process, which is managed by the Internet Engineering Task Force in accordance with RFC 2026. Any protocol defined in this document has been developed outside the Internet Standards Process and is to be understood as an extension to XMPP rather than as an evolution, development, or modification of XMPP itself.
The primary venue for discussion of XMPP Extension Protocols is the <standards@xmpp.org> discussion list.
Discussion on other xmpp.org discussion lists might also be appropriate; see <http://xmpp.org/about/discuss.shtml> for a complete list.
Errata can be sent to <editor@xmpp.org>.
The following requirements keywords as used in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119: "MUST", "SHALL", "REQUIRED"; "MUST NOT", "SHALL NOT"; "SHOULD", "RECOMMENDED"; "SHOULD NOT", "NOT RECOMMENDED"; "MAY", "OPTIONAL".
1. XEP-0258: Security Labels in XMPP <https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0258.html>.
2. XEP-0060: Publish-Subscribe <https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0060.html>.
3. XEP-0248: PubSub Collection Nodes <https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0248.html>.
4. The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) is the central coordinator for the assignment of unique parameter values for Internet protocols, such as port numbers and URI schemes. For further information, see <http://www.iana.org/>.
Note: Older versions of this specification might be available at http://xmpp.org/extensions/attic/
END